The Correlation between Teacher’s Immediacy and Junior High School Students Willingness to Communicate in English in the Classroom

Abyan Nauvall, Galuh Kirana Dwi Areni

Abstract


This study investigates the correlation between teacher immediacy and junior high school students’ willingness to communicate (WTC) in English during classroom interactions. Teacher immediacy refers to verbal and non-verbal behaviors that reduce the psychological distance between teachers and students, such as smiling, using students' names, providing encouragement, and maintaining eye contact. These behaviors are categorized into instructional and relational immediacy. Conducted at SMPN 23 Semarang, the research involved 32 eighth-grade students and employed a quantitative correlational method using Likert-scale questionnaires adapted from Zhang & Oetzel (2006) for teacher immediacy and Gol et al. (2014) for WTC. The study aimed to determine whether a significant correlation exists between perceived teacher immediacy and students’ WTC in English. Statistical analysis using SPSS 26 revealed a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.378 with a significance value of 0.033, indicating a moderate and statistically significant positive relationship between the variables. The findings suggest that students who perceive higher levels of teacher immediacy tend to exhibit a greater willingness to engage in English communication during class. Among the immediacy aspects, students perceived the teacher’s commitment to teaching and encouragement as the most prominent behaviors that foster communication. This study highlights the crucial role of teacher-student interpersonal dynamics in shaping communicative engagement and recommends that English teachers at the junior high school level consciously develop immediacy behaviors to create a more supportive and communicative classroom environment.

Keywords


Teacher Immediacy, Willingness to Communicate, Junior High School Students.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amini, D., & Weisi, H. (2023). The role of teacher immediacy and learners’ emotioncy in predicting EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(2), 387–

Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher immediacy as a predictor of teaching effectiveness. Communication Yearbook, 3, 543–559.

Borkowska, M. (2022). Teacher immediacy behaviors and their effect on students' willingness to communicate in the EFL classroom. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 182-191https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.02

Cai, Y. (2021). The importance of teacher-student interpersonal relationships in enhancing classroom participation. Journal of Educational Psychology,

Cetinkaya, Y. B. (2005). Turkish college students’ willingness to communicate in English as a foreign language (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University).

Christophel, D. M. (1990). The relationships among teacher immediacy behaviors, student motivation, and learning. Communication Education, 39(4), 323–

classrooms: Teacher support and students’ engagement. System, 114,

Conceptualizing Willingness to Communicate in a L2: A Situational Model of L2 Confidence and Affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4),

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning. Conducting, and

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed

Derakhshan, A. (2021). Teacher immediacy and its role in academic engagement: A review of the literature. International Journal of Language Education and Teaching, 9(1), 67-77. https://doi.org/10.22236/ijlet.0901.06

Derakhshan, A., Mehdizadeh, M., & Ebadi, S. (2023). The impact of teacher clarity and nonverbal immediacy on Chinese and Iranian EFL students’ affective learning. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development,

Education, 6(2), 163-175. https://doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v6i2.13197

effect of teacher immediacy, classroom environment, and willingness to communicate. System, 42, 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2013.12.014

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

Evaluating, 260, 375-382.

Fadilah, F. (2018). The influence of self-confidence and teacher immediacy on EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1), 65-77. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i1.14929

Fallah, N. (2014). Willingness to communicate in English, communication apprehension, and L2 motivation among Iranian introvert and extrovert EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(4), 983–992.

Faranda, W. T. (2015). The impact of teacher immediacy on students' willingness to communicate. Communication Education, 64(2), 195-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1022192

Froment, A., & Gutiérrez, D. (2022). The relationship between teacher care, credibility, and students’ classroom engagement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103824

Gholamrezaee, M., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). The interplay between EFL teachers’ immediacy, students’ emotions, and learning outcomes. Journal of Language and Education, 4(4), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-

Gholamrezaee, M., & Ghanizadeh, A. (2018). The relationship between teacher immediacy and cognitive learning in EFL classrooms. TESOL Quarterly,

Gol, A., Zarei, G. R., & Pourghasemian, H. (2014). The Relationship between Teacher Immediacy and Iranian EFL Learners’ Willingness to Communicate. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 3(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.3p.219

Gol, M., Yalçin, M., & Kayabasi, M. (2014). The role of teacher verbal immediacy in students' willingness to communicate in the foreign language classroom. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 182-193. https://doi.org/10.17509/jlls.v10i2.1699

Gorham, J. (1988). The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37(1), 40–53.

Hu, L., & Wang, Y. (2023). The influence of teacher immediacy on Chinese high school students’ willingness to communicate and academic engagement. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24, 169–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09766-4

Hussain, I., Baloch, N., & Raza, S. (2020). Teacher immediacy and its effect on students' motivation in the language learning process. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 12(4), 14-24. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2020/v12i430210

Jaya, H., Andriani, L. A., & Wijayanto, A. (2023). The effect of lecturer immediacy behaviors on students’ willingness to communicate in EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v8i1.1274

learners’ willingness to communicate. English Teaching & Learning, 44(2), 177–

Lee, J. S. (2020). The effects of teacher immediacy and credibility on EFL

Li, H. (2023). Perceived teacher-student relationship and growth mindset as predictors of student engagement in foreign language learning: the mediating role of foreign language enjoyment. Frontiers in Psychology, 14,

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998).

McCroskey, J. C., & Baer, J. E. (1985). Willingness to Communicate: The Construct and Its Measurement. Paper presented at the Speech Communication Association convention, Denver, CO.

Mehrabani, A., & Ghasemi, B. (2020). The relationship between teacher immediacy and Iranian EFL learners’ willingness to communicate. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 10(2), 207–214.

Mehrabian, A. (1969). Silent messages. Wadsworth.

Methods Approaches: Fourth Edition. Sage Publications

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pan, Y., Gao, X., & Kong, X. (2023). Affective scaffolding in Chinese EFL

Pishghadam, R., Sabouri, N. B., & Fathi, J. (2019). Willingness to attend classes and the influence of teacher immediacy in the EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 23(1), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818771733

Qin, S. (2022). EFL teachers’ immediacy and professional commitment as predictors of students’ boredom. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 947560. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947560

Roberts, M., & Friedman, L. (2013). The influence of teacher immediacy on student participation and engagement. Journal of Classroom Interaction,

Sioson, C. R. B. (2011). Language learning strategies, attitudes, and self-efficacy in relation to academic performance of college students in the Philippines. Asian EFL Journal, 53(1), 44–74.

students’ willingness to communicate. Indonesian Journal of English

Subekti, I. (2019). Perceived communication competence and its impact on

Sudding, T., Moradi, M., & Zamani, M. (2021). Verbal immediacy and students' willingness to communicate: The case of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(4), 550-559.

Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., & Pan, Z. (2022). EFL teachers’ immunity, work engagement, and psychological well-being in the Asian context: A comparative study. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 28, 77–93. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.28.06

Weda, R., Alghoul, F., & Karim, A. (2021). Classroom activities and teacher immediacy as predictors of students' willingness to communicate in English. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 314-326.

Zarrinabadi, N. (2014). Communicating in a second language: Investigating the

Zhang, H., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Teacher immediacy and its impact on students' willingness to communicate in the language classroom. Communication Studies, 57(2), 183-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510970500301059

Zhang, Q., & Oetzel, J. G. (2006). Perceived instructor credibility: A comparison of Chinese and U.S. American college students. Asian Journal of Communication, 16(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292980600660995

Zhang, Y. (2023). EFL learners’ boredom coping strategies: the role of teacher- student rapport and support. BMC Psychology, 11, 397.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i3.1030

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Abyan Nauvall, Galuh Kirana Dwi Areni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.