English Teachers' Perceptions and Adaptive Strategies in Using Wordwall for Teaching Adjectives: A Qualitative Case Study
Abstract
Digital technology has transformed English language teaching, with game-based platforms increasingly integrated into grammar instruction. However, research on teachers' integration of Wordwall for teaching specific grammar items, particularly adjectives at the secondary level, remains limited. This study investigates three aspects: English teachers' perceptions of Wordwall, the challenges they encounter, and the adaptive strategies they employ when teaching adjectives in secondary school. Using a qualitative descriptive case study design, the study involved three English teachers at a private secondary school in West Cikarang, West Java, Indonesia. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, document analysis of lesson plans and Wordwall templates, and teachers' reflective journals. Thematic analysis followed the miles 2014 framework. Findings indicate that teachers perceived Wordwall as accessible, motivating, and pedagogically relevant. Three categories of challenges emerged: technical barriers (internet instability and limited devices), pedagogical barriers (classroom management and overemphasis on competition), and content relevance barriers (misalignment with local context). Teachers responded with adaptive strategies including template modification, scaffolding, post-game reflective activities, and peer collaboration. The study concludes that Wordwall can serve as an effective medium for active, student-centered grammar instruction when teachers apply systematic pedagogical adaptation. Findings advance the literature on technology integration in EFL grammar teaching within the TAM, TPACK, and Technology Integration Barriers frameworks.
Keywords
References
Alqahtani, M. (2019). The importance of vocabulary in language learning and how to be taught. International Journal of Teaching and Education, 3(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.20472/TE.2015.3.3.002
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active Learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.
Chapelle, C. (2003). English language learning and technology: Lectures on applied linguistics in the age of information and communication technology. In John Benjamins Publishing (Vol. 7).
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches.
Damayanti, I. L., Febrianti, Y., Nurlaelawati, I., Suharto, P. P., Fellani, A. J., & Rahmadhani, R. (2022). English for Nusantara for junior high school grade VII. In Ministry of Education and Culture.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186
Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
Fianto, Z. A., Kawuryan, S. P., Saptono, B., Mujinem, N., & Putri, G. M. (2024). Perceptions of elementary school teacher education students on the use of Wordwall interactive media as a quiz. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v8i1.65492
Fonna, F., & Adani, S. (2025). Wordwall in the classroom: A qualitative study of student-teacher perspectives. Journal of Research in Instructional, 5(2), 640–655. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v5i2.738
Gee, J. P. (2007). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. In Palgrave Macmillan.
Insani, A. N. P., Romadhon, M. G. E., & Heriyawati, D. F. (2024). Teachers’ voices in Wordwall media application in teaching young learners context: A narrative inquiry. English Review: Journal of English Education, 12(1), 117–124. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v12i1.9212
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. In Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x
Paksi, G. R., Sari, R. K., & Somawati, S. (2023). Teacher perceptions on the use of the WordWall.Net application as an English vocabulary learning media. Edunesia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i1.307
Prensky, M. (2007). Digital game-based learning. In Paragon House.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. In Temple Smith.
Sukmawati, S., & Nensia, N. (2019). The role of Google Classroom in ELT. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 142–145. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1526
Teo, T. (2011). Factors influencing teachers’ intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers and Education, 57(4), 2432–2440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008
Urnila, S., Wulandari, N. S., & Prasongko, A. (2024a). No Title.
Urnila, S., Wulandari, N. S., & Prasongko, A. (2024b). Teachers’ perceptions on the use of digital games to support young learner vocabulary learning. Child Education Journal, 6(2), 99–110. https://doi.org/10.33086/cej.v6i2.6021
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In Harvard University Press.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. In SAGE Publications.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i4.2576
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kima Lovely Berry, Fela Dafitri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


