Qualitative Study: English Language Education Students' Perceptions of the Use of AI Technology in Academic Writing
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed academic writing by providing digital tools that support English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners throughout the writing process. Among these tools, QuillBot has become one of the most widely used because it offers accessible features such as paraphrasing, grammar checking, and vocabulary enhancement that directly address common writing difficulties faced by students. This study aimed to explore English Education students’ perceptions of using QuillBot in academic writing, the features they utilized, the challenges they encountered, and its contribution to their writing development. A qualitative descriptive design was employed involving 17 fourth-semester students of the English Education Study Program at Universitas PGRI Ronggolawe (UNIROW), Tuban. Data were collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using descriptive statistics and the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña. The findings revealed generally positive perceptions, with students reporting improvements in grammar, vocabulary, sentence structure, paraphrasing, writing efficiency, and confidence. However, concerns regarding overdependence, originality, and academic integrity were also identified. The study contributes to the growing literature on AI-assisted writing by providing qualitative insights into students’ experiences and offers practical implications for integrating AI tools into academic writing instruction while promoting critical thinking and responsible AI use.
Keywords
References
Amaliah. (2025). AI-Assisted Writing in EFL Context.
Amani, N., & Bisriyah, M. (2025). University Students’ Perceptions of AI-Assisted Writing Tools in Supporting Self-Regulated Writing Practices. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 91–107. https://ijeltal.org/index.php/ijeltal/article/view/1942
Amyatun, & Kholis. (2023). Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Writing in EFL Learning.
Andriani, A., Fatimah, A. S., & Permatasari, S. A. (2024). Investigating EFL Students’ Self-Efficacy on the Use of QuillBot Paraphrasing Tool in Academic Writing. ENGLISH FRANCA: Academic Journal of English Language and Education, 8(1), 33–52. https://doi.org/10.29240/ef.v8i1.8831
Bearman, M., Ryan, J., & Ajjawi, R. (2023). Discourses of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: A Critical Literature Review. Higher Education, 86(2), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-022-00937-2
Bensalem, E., Harizi, R., & Boujlida, A. (2024). Exploring Undergraduate Students’ Usage and Perceptions of AI Writing Tools. Global Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 14(2), 53–65. https://un-pub.eu/ojs/index.php/GJFLT/article/view/9344
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive Sampling: Complex or Simple? Research Case Examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Crompton, H., & Song, D. (2023). The Potential of Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master’s-Level Students and Research Trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264
Indria. (2025). Students’ Perceptions of QuillBot in Academic Writing.
Jiang, R. (2022). How Does Artificial Intelligence Empower EFL Teaching and Learning Nowadays? A Review on Artificial Intelligence in the EFL Context. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1049401. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1049401
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: Developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., & Krusche, S. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Laila, N., & Daulay, E. (2024). Students’ Perception of Using QuillBot to Improve Students’ Writing Skills. Indonesian EFL Journal, 10(2), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v10i2.10083
Latifah, S., Muth’im, A., & Nasrullah, N. (2024). The Use of QuillBot in Academic Writing: A Systematic Literature Review. Journey: Journal of English Language and Pedagogy, 7(1), 110–121. https://doi.org/10.33503/journey.v7i1.872
Lee, J. (2025). Strategic Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Different Writing Proficiency Levels.
Mahapatra. (2024). Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data analysis A methods Sourcebook (3th editio). Sage Publications.
Muliana, M., Muhsin, M. A., & Intan, N. (2025). Exploring QuillBot Application in Writing Skill: A Study at EFL Higher Education in Indonesia. Proceedings of Forum for University Scholars in Interdisciplinary Opportunities and Networking, 1(1), 203–211.
Muliana, M., Muhsin, M. A., & Intan, N. (2024). Exploring QuillBot Application in Writing Skill: A Study at EFL Higher Education in Indonesia. Proceedings of Forum for University Scholars in Interdisciplinary Opportunities and Networking, 1(1), 203–211.
Nisa, & Riyono. (2025). Students’ Critical Evaluation of AI-Generated Writing Suggestions.
Rafida, T., Suwandi, S., & Ananda, R. (2024). EFL Students’ Perception in Indonesia and Taiwan on Using Artificial Intelligence to Enhance Writing Skills. Jurnal Ilmiah Peuradeun, 12(3), 987–1016.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever Happened to Qualitative Description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Wahyuni, S., Putro, N. H. P. S., & Efendi, A. (2024). Trends in Artificial Intelligence-Infused English Language Learning: A Comprehensive Bibliometric and Content Review. Advanced Education, 25, 162–178. https://doi.org/10.20535/2410-8286.315035
Wijaya, & Rachmawati. (2025). Ethical Issues in the Use of AI Writing Assistants.
Yoandita, & Hasnah. (2024). QuillBot as an AI-Based Writing Assistant for EFL Students.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v%25vi%25i.2998
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Nanda Wati Ika Syafitri, Agus Wardhono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
