Scaffolding the Reading-to-Writing Process: A Qualitative Study of EFL Undergraduate Students’ Learning Experiences
Abstract
This qualitative case study examined the implementation of scaffolding in the reading-to-writing process among 25 third-semester EFL undergraduate students enrolled in an Academic Writing course. The study aimed to explore how scaffolding supported students in understanding academic texts, developing ideas, producing written texts, and becoming more independent learners. Data were collected through classroom observations, semi-structured interviews, and document analysis, and were analyzed thematically. The findings show that scaffolding supported students through several stages: preparing for reading, reading and understanding, processing information, planning writing, drafting, feedback and revision, and independent writing. Cognitive and linguistic scaffolding, including guiding questions, vocabulary explanation, text analysis, and language models, helped students identify main ideas and important information. Procedural scaffolding through outlines, graphic organizers, and writing models helped students organize ideas and plan their writing. Peer feedback provided social scaffolding that encouraged students to evaluate and revise their work. However, students still experienced difficulties with paraphrasing, selecting relevant information, organizing ideas, and developing supporting arguments. The findings also indicate a gradual shift from teacher-supported learning toward greater learner independence. The study concludes that scaffolding should be integrated across reading and writing stages and gradually reduced as students develop confidence and independent academic literacy.
Keywords
References
Agus, S., & Lailatul, Q. (2024). Transforming reading abilities: Unleashing the power of scaffolding in Quizizz. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 4(2), 1435–1446. https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v4i2.36047
Cao, S., Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Wang, T., Zhou, T., & Xu, Y. (2022). A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on English writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1035803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1035803
Chen, T. (2016). Technology-supported peer feedback in ESL/EFL writing classes: a research synthesis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 365–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.960942
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2013). Reading and writing together: A critical component of English for academic purposes teaching and learning. TESOL Journal, 4(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.65
Grabe, W., & Zhang, C. (2016). Reading-writing relationships in first and second language academic literacy development. Language Teaching, 49(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0261444816000082
Hassen, S. K., Adugna, E. T., & Bogale, Y. N. (2024). EFL students’ writing achievement via the execution of scaffolding strategies instruction. System, 125(103439), 103439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103439
Huiling Zhang, & Charanjit Kaur Swaran Singh. (2025). Scaffolding and Reading Comprehension: A Literature Review. International Journal of Modern Languages and Applied Linguistics, 9(2), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.24191/ijmal.v9i2.4671
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van den Broek, P., & van Driel, J. (2018). The impact of formative peer feedback on higher education students’ academic writing: a Meta-Analysis. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(6), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1545896
Hyland, K. (2016). Academic publishing: Issues and challenges in the construction of knowledge. Oxford University Press. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=j9enCwAAQBAJ&printsec=frontc...
Hyland, K. (2024). Genre‐based instruction and corpora. TESOL Quarterly, 58(3), 1227–1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3273
Knoch, U., & Sitajalabhorn, W. (2013). A closer look at integrated writing tasks: Towards a more focussed definition for assessment purposes. Assessing Writing, 18(4), 300–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.09.003
Kyle, K. (2020). The relationship between features of source text use and integrated writing quality. Assessing Writing, 45(100467), 100467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100467
Liang, T., Singh, C. K. S., Mulyadi, D., & Singh, T. S. M. (2025). Enhancing EFL Writing Through Online Peer Feedback: A Systematic Review of Higher Education Studies. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(1), 184. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n1p184
Puspitasari, A., Jailani, M. K., Basthomi, Y., Suharyadi, S., & Zen, E. L. (2025). Multimodal scaffolding in critical reading: Pedagogical insights from Indonesian EFL learners. A Journal of Culture English Language Teaching Literature & Linguistics, 12(2), 924–947. https://doi.org/10.22219/celtic.v12i2.42721
Puspitasari, P. (2023). Mengembangkan Kesadaran Diri Pada Siswa untuk Mencegah Tindak Perundungan di Sekolah Dasar. Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal), 4(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.56667/dejournal.v4i1.901
Suci, D. N., Basthomi, Y., Mukminatien, N., Santihastuti, A., & Syamdianita, S. (2021). EFL students’ responses on teacher’s online written feedback: Interaction, revision, and perception. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i2.28549
van de Pol, J., Volman, M., & Beishuizen, J. (2010). Scaffolding in teacher–student interaction: A decade of research. Educational Psychology Review, 22(3), 271–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9127-6
Vuogan, A., & Li, S. (2023). Examining the effectiveness of peer feedback in second language writing: A meta‐analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1115–1138. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3178
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Ye, W., & Liu, J. (2023). Exploring and modeling the reading-writing connection in EFL integrated writing. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1161272. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161272
DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v11i5.3184
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kety Soraya, Ulinuha Dahlina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


