Grammatical Metaphor on the Students’ Writing Research Paper; A Systemic Functional Linguistics

Sahlan Tampubolon, Usman Sidabutar

Abstract


The difficulties of writing research paper devokes grammatical metaphors in the perspectives of SFL to be applied in academic writing. This paper presents the process type and functions of ideational grammatical metaphor towards the students' writing research paper. The research design was applied by descriptive qualitative deployed on the English students’ writing. The findings deployed the process type of nominalization in ideational grammatical metaphor on the students' research papers was dominant in the material process and relational process. The function realization of deployment in transcategorisation of process to thing is the highest frequency on the clauses and followed to transcategorisation of process to quality. The frequency shows that several weaknesses encompassing the ability to employ grammatical meanings and the use of lexical cohesion. The research present a strategy for English learners and teachers to enhance writing qualities and language detections as an innovation in managing lexical varieties.


Keywords


systemic functional linguistics, grammatical metaphor, ideational grammatical metaphor, reasearch writing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ayomi, P. N., Dreyfus, S., Hadi, S., & Sutrisno, A. (2020). ‘The Research is Conducted…’: An Exploration of a Grammatical Metaphor Syndrome in Indonesian Research Articles. Lingua Cultura, 14(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v14i1.6342

Davie, G., & Wyatt, D. (2013). Document analysis. In The Routledge Handbook of Research Methods in the Study of Religion. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203154281-19

Espa, R., Journal, S., Linguistics, A., Benjamins, J., & Company, P. (2021). John Benjamins Publishing Company Academic writing and publishing A focus on Spanish English-linguistics scholars ’ self-reported attitudes , practices and perceptions.

Fatimah, N. (2019). Students’ Needs for Academic Writing at the English Education Department. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 1(3), 161. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v1i3.744

Halliday, M. A. ., & Matthiessen, M. I. . (2014). Haliday’s Systemic Functional Grammar 4th Edition.

Halliday, M. A. K. ., & Martin, J. R. (1993). GeneralOrientation. Writing Science: Literacy anddiscursive power.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2013). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar: Fourth edition. In Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar: Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203431269

Hoa, P. Van, & Vui, N. Van. (2015). Applying grammatical metaphor to academic writing. 1(12), 105–108.

Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318

Leeming D. The Use of Theory in Qualitative Research. Journal of Human Lactation. 2018;34(4):668-673. doi:10.1177/0890334418794666

Malik, S. (2023). Identification of Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Saraiki Language and its Deployment in Different Registers of Saraiki and English: A Contrastive Study. NUML Journal of Critical Inquiry, 21(II), 34–63. https://doi.org/10.52015/numljci.v21iii.261

Martin, J. R. (2020). Metaphors we feel by: Stratal tension. Journal of World Languages, 6(1–2), 8–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/21698252.2020.1720158

Octaberlina, L. R., & Muslimin, A. I. (2022). Error Analysis on EFL Students‟ Thesis Proposal Writing. World Journal of English Language, 12(6), 331–342. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n6p331

Oussou, S., Kerouad, S., & Hdii, S. (2024). The Relationship between EFL Students’ Use of Writing Strategies and Their Writing Achievement. Jurnal Arbitrer, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.25077/ar.11.1.1-12.2024

Rastri, A., Rezeki, Y. S., Salam, U., Riyanti, D., & Surmiyati, S. (2023). An Analysis of Students’ Problems in Writing a Research Proposal. Acitya: Journal of Teaching and Education, 5(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.30650/ajte.v5i1.3479

Sidabutar, U., & Tampubolon, S. (2024). Students ’ Performance in Cultural Text Writing Based on Situational Context and Cohesive Devices : A case study of Discourse Analysis. 10(1), 1091–1100.

Suardana, K. I. (2020). Grammatical Metaphor in Pan Balangtamak: Systemic Functional Linguistics Perspective. International Journal of Linguistics and Discourse Analytics, 2(1), 14–28.

Suhirman, L., & Rahayu, B. (2021). Empowering EFL Teachers for Scientific Writing in PPG Workshop: Writing Classroom Action Research Proposal. Indonesian Journal of EFL and Linguistics, 6(2), 473. https://doi.org/10.21462/ijefl.v6i2.414

Thompson, G., & Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing Functional Grammar. In Introducing Functional Grammar. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203785270

Tian, W. (2022). Grammatical Metaphor Analysis in English Teaching. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 2, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v2i.712

Wijaya, A. R. T., Nugraheni, G. V. A., & Bram, B. (2019). Grammatical Errors in Undergraduate Students’ Research Proposal Writing. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 11(2), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.21274/ls.2019.11.2.291-308

Wu, L., & Halim, H. B. A. (2024). Task complexity and foreign language writing emotions as predictors of EFL writing performance. Frontiers in Education, 9(March). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1323843

Yamin, M., & Purwati, O. (2020). Enhancing Critical Writing towards Undergraduate Students in Conducting Research Proposal. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.10

Zhang, Y. (2018). Examining the Application of Grammatical Metaphors in Academic Writing. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(2), 108. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n2p108

Zhao, J. (2017). Native speaker advantage in academic writing? Conjunctive realizations in EAP writing by four groups of writers. Ampersand, 4, 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2017.07.001




DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i1.627

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Sahlan Tampubolon, Usman Sidabutar

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.